Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Method and Point

Running Head: RELIGIOSITY AND CONSEQUENTIALIST MORAL THINKING Religiosity, Political Orientation, and Consequentialist Moral Thinking

Religiosity and Consequentialist Moral Thinking 2 Three studies demonstrated that the moral judgments of religious individuals and political conservatives are highly insensitive to consequentialist (i.e., outcome-based) considerations. In Study 1, both religiosity and political conservatism predicted a resistance towards consequentialist thinking concerning a range of transgressive acts, indepe...

Death-Thinking and its Relation to Heidegger’s Art-Thinking

Heidegger’s Art thinking is the result of his later thought. But the death-thinking is attendant with “Being thinking” in the whole of his thought. In fundamental ontology, “Being” is understood through “Dasein”. The problem of Dasein historicity and temporality led heidegger to contemplate about death. After “turning,” death thinking, it was followed through the “Event (Ereignis) thinking”. In...

Disaster and Its Moral

visual versus verbal Thinking and Dual‐Process Moral cognition

Moral judgments are not produced by a unified “moral faculty.” Instead, they are influenced by a combination of automatic emotional responses and controlled cognitive processes with distinctive cognitive profiles (Cushman, Young, & Hauser, 2006; Greene, Morelli, Lowenberg, Nystrom, & Cohen, 2008; Moore, Clark, & Kane, 2008; Paxton, Ungar, & Greene, 2011) and neural substrates (Greene, Sommervil...

The role of analytic thinking in moral judgements and values

While individual differences in the willingness and ability to engage analytic processing have long informed research in reasoning and decision making, the implications of such differences have not yet had a strong influence in other domains of psychological research. We claim that analytic thinking is not limited to problems that have a normative basis and, as an extension of this, predict tha...